Assignment #2 – Annotated Bibliography
Objectives:
·
To
explore scholarly research
·
To
organize your research
·
To
practice rhetorical reading and interpretation of scholarly sources
·
To
learn how to search for appropriate scholarly sources
Assignment:
You will
write an annotated bibliography, summarizing and evaluating relevant sources
for your research.
What is an annotated bib? An annotated bib is simply a list of
sources (a bibliography) for your project. It should contain: a focusing introduction
to the bibliography and a short descriptive and evaluative summary (annotation)
of each source on the list. The short (roughly half page) introduction to the
annotated bib explains the purpose and focus of the bibliography – who will be
interested in it, and what your criteria are for inclusion and exclusion of
sources. The roughly 100-200 annotation (summary) following each source
summarizes and evaluates the source and details in relation to the
bibliography’s topic, and thus its usefulness to your research.
How should you write each entry? Use as few words as possible to
provide as much information about each source as is relevant for your research
project.
Strategies:
First,
explain the type of source you are annotating, the topic of the piece, and the
qualifications of the author. For example, “in this scholarly journal article,
John Jones, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University, evaluates approaches to
reading incentives.”
Then describe
research methods (if any) and summarize the main claims of the piece. For
example, “Jones surveyed 400 high school students and concluded that A and B
types of incentives are not as useful as C types of incentives.” You can
include as much or as little detail about the findings/claims as will be
relevant and helpful to you for your own paper. When necessary, include direct
quotations or summaries to strengthen your summary. If you directly quote or
even paraphrase, you should include the page number(s) for that information as
a parenthetical citation.
You do not
need to include information that is of no possible relevance to your own
research. You should make clear how this source is relevant to your own
research if it is not obvious. For example, “This article is of relevance to my
research project in its definitions of motivation and incentives and in its
figures about specific inventive programs.”
You should
evaluate the claims and credibility of the author as necessary. For example, if
the author seems to be biased or if you think her interpretations of her data
is flawed, you can comment on that in your annotation. For example, “Jones
argues that Pizza Hut’s Book It Program is the only successful reading
incentive program. However, his claim is questionable because he is a shareholder
in Pizza Hut stock.”
How is an
annotated bib arranged and formatted? Arrange the bibliography alphabetically,
beginning each entry (source) with an MLA citation (just like it would appear
on a Works Cited page) and following that with its annotation. MLA format
mandates that the entire bibliography should be double spaced. Do not put an
extra space between entries. Use hanging indent after first line of citation.
Example:
Goldscheider,
Frances Kobrin, Linda J. Waite, and Christina Witsberger. “Nonfamily
Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults.” AmericanSociological Review 51 (1986): 541-554
Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults.” AmericanSociological Review 51 (1986): 541-554
The authors, researchers at the Rand
Corporation and Brown University, use data from National Longitudinal Surveys of
Young Women and Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults
alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief
in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females,
while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from
parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in
attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no
significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.
How many sources are required?
I cannot give you source requirement.
You are each researching different conversations, each varying in numbers of
participants. What I want is for you to use this as an opportunity to get into
a conversation and see what has been said. Five sources is probably an
underachievement (unless your research area is brand new); 25 is probably an
overachievement. Remember that your research project is an attempt to join a
conversation. The annotated bib is an overview of that conversation. Too few
sources, and you probably haven’t explored the conversation. Too many, and you
will never get to say what you have to say!
What is the
purpose? The primary purpose of the annotated bib is to get you reading the
ongoing conversation about the research that interests you. But as you do that,
you need a way to stay organized, so the secondary purpose of the annotated bib
is to serve as a research aid. You will not find a better way to organize and
keep track of your reading. With large, multiple-source projects, you’ll always
fight some level confusion about “who said that?” or “where did I read that?”
Annotated bibs give you a bird’s eye view of who said what on what topics. They
also serve as the main preparation for writing a review of literature, which
comes next.
Evaluation:
Successful
bibliographies will paint a clear picture of the “conversation” taking place
about your topic. The best annotations will be clearly and concisely written,
they will thoroughly describe that takes place in the article, they will
evaluate the motivations and assumptions of the article, and will connect to
your research project.
No comments:
Post a Comment